@article{oai:shinshu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001996,
 author = {多武保, 明宏 and 古澤, 清文 and 山本, 雅也 and 安田, 浩一 and 上松, 隆司 and 山岡, 稔 and 吉川, 仁育 and 岡藤, 範正 and 戸苅, 惇毅},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {松本歯学},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {Wire and titanium bone screw osteosynthesis after sagittal split osteotomy has been used for 78 cases of the mandibular prognathism at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery II of the Matsumoto Dental College since 1985. Sixty-six cases could be included in a follow-up study, and the comparison could be made between the two fixation methods. We investigated the incidence of both mental nerve paresthesia and prolonged mucosal wound healing in each side in which wire or bone screw fixation was applied. In cases of the posterior transfer of the corpus mandibulae more than 5mm, the incidence of the prolonged mucosal wound healing in side patients in whom the bone screw was applied was significantly higher than that in patients in whom the wire was applied. On the other hand, the incidence of the mental nerve paresthesia was not statistically significant between wire fixation and bone screw fixation., application/pdf},
 pages = {291--294},
 title = {下顎枝矢状分割骨切り術における骨固定法の違いによるオトガイ神経と粘膜創の治癒に与える影響},
 volume = {21},
 year = {1995}
}